<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireless Series (Part 2): You Got Some Sweet Wi-Fi…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattjacoby.com/wireless-series-part-2-you-got-some-sweet-wi-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattjacoby.com/wireless-series-part-2-you-got-some-sweet-wi-fi/</link>
	<description>a tech blog for non-techie peoplez</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 10:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabloggy</title>
		<link>http://mattjacoby.com/wireless-series-part-2-you-got-some-sweet-wi-fi/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabloggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattjacoby.com/jabloggy-techblog/?p=51#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily.  Let&#039;s take Madison, WI for example.  We still need a third party Internet Service Provider (ISP) like Charter to access the Internet in our homes and offices.  The wireless city access that&#039;s setup is only a downtown service, and you could pay to access it on your mobile device or laptop while you&#039;re downtown (since you can&#039;t access your home Internet from downtown).

I&#039;m not sure what the politics are like if a city provides access to the entire city and acts as a competitor to a third party that already &quot;owns&quot; that particular area.  It may already exist like this in some cities, but I&#039;m not entirely sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily.  Let&#8217;s take Madison, WI for example.  We still need a third party Internet Service Provider (ISP) like Charter to access the Internet in our homes and offices.  The wireless city access that&#8217;s setup is only a downtown service, and you could pay to access it on your mobile device or laptop while you&#8217;re downtown (since you can&#8217;t access your home Internet from downtown).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the politics are like if a city provides access to the entire city and acts as a competitor to a third party that already &#8220;owns&#8221; that particular area.  It may already exist like this in some cities, but I&#8217;m not entirely sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://mattjacoby.com/wireless-series-part-2-you-got-some-sweet-wi-fi/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattjacoby.com/jabloggy-techblog/?p=51#comment-73</guid>
		<description>So eventually, with the city-wide access, will we be able to drop our internet providers for a free or cheap way to access the internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So eventually, with the city-wide access, will we be able to drop our internet providers for a free or cheap way to access the internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

